プーチン氏、国防相に経済学者を任命　軍部の「過剰な官僚主義」に批判 [ウクライナ情勢]：朝日新聞デジタル

In a recent turn of events, a former president’s arrest has sparked controversy within the legal system. The ex-president of a real estate company, who was arrested and prosecuted by the Osaka District Public Prosecutor’s Office on suspicion of embezzlement, only to be acquitted, is now seeking compensation from the government. What has raised eyebrows is the revelation that during the interrogation process, one of the investigating prosecutors advised the chief prosecutor that it might be better to hold off on the arrest.

This unusual disclosure sheds light on the internal dynamics of the legal system and raises questions about the decision-making process behind such high-profile cases. The fact that a prosecutor would suggest delaying an arrest in a case that ultimately led to an acquittal has left many wondering about the motives and considerations involved.

The ongoing legal battle between the former president and the government has now taken a new turn with these revelations. It remains to be seen how this new information will impact the case and whether it will lead to further scrutiny of the actions taken by the prosecutors involved. As the legal drama unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the complexities and intricacies of the justice system and the importance of transparency and accountability in legal proceedings.