Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

“5万株の夏色マリーゴールドが見頃!このしまアイランドパークで” – 朝日新聞デジタル

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In a groundbreaking ruling, a court has recognized “indirect discrimination” against women in a company’s housing policy that only applies to full-time employees. The ruling, which has now been finalized, marks a significant step in addressing gender inequality in the workplace.

The court found that the company’s policy of providing housing exclusively to male employees in higher-ranking positions while denying the same benefit to female employees in similar roles constituted indirect discrimination. This discriminatory practice perpetuated gender stereotypes and limited the career advancement opportunities for women within the company.

The case sheds light on the pervasive issue of gender discrimination in the workplace and underscores the importance of creating inclusive and equitable policies that promote gender equality. By recognizing and addressing instances of indirect discrimination, companies can take proactive steps towards fostering a more diverse and inclusive work environment.

The ruling serves as a reminder to companies to review their policies and practices to ensure they are free from any form of discrimination. It also highlights the need for ongoing efforts to promote gender equality and create a workplace where all employees are treated fairly and have equal opportunities for advancement.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money