Utah senator Mitt Romney has found himself in the spotlight once again, this time due to a controversial comparison involving South Dakota governor Kristi Noem and their respective treatment of their dogs.
Romney adamantly rejected any parallels between his infamous 2012 dog scandal and the unfolding one surrounding Governor Noem, who admitted to shooting her 14-month-old puppy in her new book, “No Going Back.”
In a bold statement, Romney emphasized, “I didn’t eat my dog. I didn’t shoot my dog. I loved my dog, and my dog loved me.” The senator was referring to the incident from 2007 when it was revealed that he had tied his Irish setter Seamus to the roof of his station wagon during a family road trip.
Now, as Noem faces backlash for her actions, Romney is distancing himself from the South Dakota governor, suggesting that her controversial decision could impact her chances of being considered for Vice President by President Trump.
Despite facing criticism, Noem defended her actions on social media, stating that tough decisions like this are common on a farm and citing South Dakota law regarding aggressive dogs.
The unfolding saga has reignited discussions about the treatment of animals and the ethical responsibilities of pet owners. As both politicians navigate the fallout from these revelations, the public remains divided on the issue of animal welfare and the moral implications of such actions.