The Quebec government’s plan to establish a new museum dedicated to the history of the Québécois nation has sparked controversy and raised questions about how history is told and who it includes. Premier François Legault faced criticism for suggesting that Quebec’s history began with the arrival of French explorers in the 16th and 17th centuries, excluding the contributions of Indigenous peoples.
Historians and Indigenous leaders have expressed concerns about the framing of the new museum, with some accusing the government of attempting to erase Indigenous history. Steven High, a history professor at Concordia University, emphasized the political nature of history and the importance of including diverse perspectives.
In response to the backlash, Legault defended the museum’s focus on the French-speaking Québécois nation but assured that Indigenous people would not be excluded. However, critics argue that the emphasis on prominent figures like Céline Dion and Les Cowboys Fringants overlooks the contributions of Indigenous communities.
The controversy highlights the ongoing debate over whose history is prioritized and how it is presented. Indigenous leaders, such as Ghislain Picard of the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador, insist that Indigenous perspectives must be central to any narrative about Quebec’s history.
As the programming for the new museum is developed, experts stress the importance of including diverse voices and challenging traditional narratives. The debate underscores the complexities of representing history and the need for inclusive storytelling that acknowledges the full spectrum of Quebec’s diverse heritage.