Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

A Deal Between Israel and Saudi Arabia Will Not Lead to Palestinian Freedom

Reading Time: 2 minutes

In a surprising turn of events, senior members of the U.S. government are once again advocating for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. President Joe Biden, in his State of the Union address in March, emphasized that “the only real solution is a two-state solution,” aligning with the longstanding position of the United States on the matter.

However, the recent U.S. veto of a United Nations Security Council resolution that would have facilitated Palestine’s full membership in the U.N. has raised questions about the administration’s commitment to Palestinian statehood. The U.S. justified its veto by asserting that Palestinian statehood should be achieved through bilateral negotiations with Israel, a stance that seems challenging given Israel’s reluctance to entertain the idea of Palestinian statehood.

The Biden administration’s strategy for advancing Palestinian statehood hinges on fostering normalized relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel. This approach, reminiscent of the Abraham Accords initiated by the previous administration, aims to incentivize Israel to pursue Palestinian statehood in exchange for improved regional alliances and security arrangements.

Critics argue that the U.S. policy towards Israel and Palestine must prioritize human rights and international law over geopolitical considerations. They point out the need for the U.S. to hold Israel accountable for violations and to support Palestinian aspirations for self-determination.

To address the longstanding conflict, the Biden administration is urged to take bold steps, including recognizing Palestine as a state within the pre-1967 borders, reopening diplomatic missions, and supporting Palestinian legal efforts at international courts. These actions are seen as essential for shifting the dynamics of the peace process and promoting a more equitable resolution for both parties.

In light of escalating tensions and the entrenched status quo, the U.S. faces a critical juncture in its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By prioritizing human rights, international law, and Palestinian self-determination, the Biden administration has the opportunity to reshape the narrative and pursue a more just and sustainable resolution to the decades-long conflict.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money