Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

A Lawmaker in California Wants the Public to Know Who Owns Businesses

Reading Time: < 1 minute

California Lawmaker Pushes for Transparency in Business Ownership

In an effort to crack down on opaque ownership structures that allow some companies to evade state laws, California State Senator Maria Elana Durazo is pushing for legislation that would require business owners and landlords to disclose their identities. The bill would mandate that limited liability companies (LLCs) and similar corporations list anyone who owns at least 25% of the company’s assets on its registration with the state.

Durazo argues that the lack of transparency in corporate ownership has allowed individuals to shield their identities and assets, making it difficult for government officials and law enforcement agencies to hold them accountable for violations. The bill has garnered support from labor, housing, and environmental groups, but faces opposition from business groups, including those representing landlords.

Critics of the bill point to the costs associated with implementing the new disclosure requirement, estimated at $9 million upfront and an additional $3.4 million annually. However, proponents argue that the lack of transparency in corporate ownership has serious consequences, citing cases where landlords have evaded responsibility for unsafe living conditions and employers have cheated workers out of their pay.

The push for transparency in business ownership is not unique to California, as similar legislation has been passed at the federal level and in other states like New York. The debate over the bill in California highlights the ongoing tension between privacy concerns and the need for accountability in the business world.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money