Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

A Texas Man Seeks Out-Of-State Abortions for His Ex-Partner Through Court Subpoena

Reading Time: < 1 minute

A Texas man is making headlines as he petitions a court to uncover who allegedly assisted his former partner in obtaining an out-of-state abortion, sparking a legal battle that could have far-reaching implications for abortion access in the state. The man’s attorney, Jonathan Mitchell, a key figure in Texas’ strict abortion ban, is leading the charge, while the woman is represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights and attorneys at Arnold and Porter.

The legal action, known as a “Rule 202” request, aims to uncover any illegal activity surrounding the alleged procedure. If approved, the court could compel the woman and others accused of assisting her to provide documents and sit for depositions. This move comes in the wake of Texas’ controversial abortion ban, which allows for enforcement through private civil actions or criminal statutes, with penalties of up to life in prison for those involved in facilitating abortions.

The case has sparked debate over the limits of state abortion laws and the right to interstate abortion access. With the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision two years ago to end the nationwide right to abortion, states with bans are grappling with how to prevent their residents from seeking abortions in states where they remain legal. Anti-abortion forces are increasingly turning to the courts to test the boundaries of these restrictions and hold individuals accountable for their role in facilitating abortions.

As the legal battle unfolds, advocates on both sides of the abortion debate are closely watching to see how the courts will interpret and enforce these laws, with potentially far-reaching consequences for abortion access in Texas and beyond.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money