Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Appeals court rules grant program for Black women business owners discriminatory

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In a recent ruling by a U.S. federal court of appeals panel, the Fearless Fund, a venture capital firm based in Atlanta, had its grant program for Black women business owners suspended. The panel sided with a conservative group, the American American Alliance for Equal Rights, led by activist Edward Blum, who argued that the program was discriminatory.

Blum celebrated the ruling, stating that programs excluding individuals based on race are unjust and polarizing. However, Fearless Fund CEO Arian Simone expressed devastation over the decision, emphasizing the impact on the organizations and women the fund has supported.

The legal battle against workplace diversity programs has seen mixed outcomes, with some lawsuits being dismissed while others, like the one against the Fearless Fund, gaining traction. The court found that the grant program violated the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits race-based discrimination in contracts.

The ruling has significant implications for diversity and inclusion efforts in the corporate world, with civil rights groups and philanthropic organizations closely monitoring the case. The Fearless Fund’s Strivers Grant Contest, which provides financial support to Black women-owned businesses, has been suspended for the duration of the lawsuit.

The decision reflects the ongoing debate over the legality and effectiveness of diversity programs, with experts predicting that the case may eventually reach the Supreme Court. The outcome could have far-reaching consequences for businesses, nonprofits, and philanthropic organizations striving to promote equality and opportunity for marginalized groups.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money