Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Bombay HC to deliver verdict on pleas filed by Kunal Kamra and others regarding fake news on Jan 31

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The Bombay High Court has decided to extend its verdict on the pleas filed by stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra and others challenging the 2023 amendment of Information Technology (IT) Rules for Intermediaries. The verdict, which was supposed to be delivered on Monday, will now be announced on January 31. This decision comes after the central government stated that it would not notify the Fact Check Unit until then.

The IT rules in question include the establishment of a Fact Checking Unit (FCU) to identify and flag fake, false, and misleading information on social media platforms. The government had earlier mentioned that the FCU would be responsible for identifying such information. However, critics, including Kunal Kamra, the Editors Guild of India, and the Association of Indian Magazines, have raised concerns about the arbitrary nature of these rules and their potential impact on citizens’ fundamental rights.

The Centre has clarified that the Rules are not intended to suppress opinions, criticism, satire, or humor but to combat the spread of fake news and misinformation on social media. The petitions filed against the amended Rules seek to declare them unconstitutional and prevent the government from taking action against individuals based on these rules.

The high court, comprising Justices Gautam Patel and Neela Gokhale, concluded the arguments in this matter last year. The final verdict on the legality of the IT Rules and the establishment of the Fact Checking Unit is eagerly awaited by all parties involved.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money