Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Burman’s legal threat over Saluja’s Esops; Care Health responds

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The ongoing feud between the Burman family and the board of Care Health Insurance has escalated, with the Burmans threatening legal action if chairperson Rashmi Saluja is allowed to cash out her employee stock options (Esops). The Burmans, who own FMCG major Dabur Ltd, have raised concerns about the granting of 22.7 million stock options to Saluja, despite objections from the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai).

In a letter to the Care Health board, the Burman family investment firms highlighted their dissatisfaction with the situation, stating that Saluja stands to monetize from these “ill-gotten” options. They have demanded that the board refrain from issuing any further equity shares related to Saluja’s options and freeze payments of dividends and voting rights attached to the shares.

The Burmans have threatened legal action against the board members if their demands are not met, citing concerns about the value loss and business logic behind the compensation given to Saluja. On the other hand, the Religare spokesperson has dismissed the allegations as baseless and stated that the ESOPs granted to Saluja comply with all legal requirements.

The dispute comes in the midst of the Burman family’s plan to take over Religare Enterprises, with Care Health being a significant subsidiary. The situation remains tense as both sides stand firm on their positions, with the future ownership of Care Health hanging in the balance.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money