Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

CCLA calls for alternative to mandatory alcohol checkpoints, deems them unacceptable

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In response to a spike in impaired driving-related collisions, Ontario’s provincial police have implemented mandatory alcohol screening (MAS) at all traffic stops in the Greater Toronto Area. The move has sparked controversy, with civil rights groups raising concerns about the infringement on individuals’ rights.

Shakir Rahim, director of the Criminal Justice program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, criticized the new measures, stating that they allow officers to intervene in people’s lives without any suspicion of wrongdoing. However, OPP Highway Safety Division Sgt. Kerry Schmidt defended the decision, citing the significant increase in impaired driving incidents in the region.

Under the new rules, drivers who refuse to provide a breath sample will face criminal charges. While some argue that MAS is a violation of civil liberties, criminal defense lawyer Lydia Riva pointed out that the practice has been legal since 2018.

Despite the backlash, the OPP maintains that MAS is a proven method for reducing impaired driving incidents. The measure aims to ensure the safety of all road users in the GTA, where impaired driving offenses are particularly prevalent.

While the debate over MAS continues, the OPP is committed to enforcing the new measures to combat the growing issue of impaired driving in the region.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money