Dr. Phil’s CNN interview turns disastrous as he is grilled on law just after meeting with Trump

In a disastrous CNN interview, Dr. Phil faced intense scrutiny and criticism for his handling of an interview with former President Donald Trump. The unlicensed psychologist made several false claims about the fairness of Trump’s hush money trial, leading to a heated exchange with CNN’s Abby Phillip.

During the interview, Dr. Phil expressed his belief that Trump did not receive due process in his trial, citing Michael Cohen’s testimony as prejudicial. However, Phillip quickly corrected him, explaining that it is common for accomplices to testify in trials involving their co-conspirators.

Phillip pointed out that Cohen’s testimony was crucial in tying Trump to the hush money payment made to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. Despite Phillip’s attempts to educate Dr. Phil on trial practices, he continued to argue that Cohen’s testimony was prejudicial to the jury.

The interview sparked immediate backlash on social media, with many criticizing Dr. Phil for his handling of the interview and his apparent support for Trump. Users pointed out that Dr. Phil, a former licensed psychologist turned TV personality, was not qualified to make legal assessments and accused him of ignoring facts and allowing Trump to spread lies.

Overall, the interview highlighted the importance of accurate and informed reporting, as well as the need for journalists to hold guests accountable for their statements.