Environmentalists’ opposition to genetically modified ‘golden rice’: What’s the reason? | News | Eco-Business

In a groundbreaking decision, a court in the Philippines has banned the cultivation of Golden Rice, a genetically modified (GMO) variety that was intended to combat vitamin A deficiency, the leading cause of childhood blindness in poorer countries. The ruling, based on the constitutional right to a healthy environment, has sparked debate and resistance to the controversial crop.

Golden Rice, which produces beta-carotene in the grain, was approved for commercial cultivation three years ago in the Philippines, making it the first country to do so. The rice variety was seen as a potential solution to the widespread issue of vitamin A deficiency, particularly in children.

However, small-scale farmers and environmentalists challenged the government’s approval of Golden Rice, leading to the recent court ruling revoking its biosafety permit. This decision could have far-reaching implications, especially in countries like Bangladesh, where similar debates are ongoing.

The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) has championed Golden Rice as a way to double the vitamin A intake of children in low-income nations. Despite its potential benefits, opposition to GMO crops remains strong, with concerns about environmental impact, biodiversity, and human health.

As the debate continues, the future of Golden Rice hangs in the balance. Proponents argue that it offers a cost-effective solution to vitamin A deficiency, while opponents raise valid concerns about the potential risks associated with genetically modified crops. The court’s decision in the Philippines sets a precedent for how other countries may approach the issue of GMO varieties in the future.