F1 has successfully entered the U.S., but why is it hesitant to welcome a new American team? Congress demands explanations.

The world of Formula 1 is abuzz with controversy as American racing team Andretti faces rejection from the grid, sparking a political firestorm in Washington. The legendary team, with an engine built by a U.S. automaker, sought entry into the pinnacle of motorsport, only to be denied by Formula One Group, prompting U.S. lawmakers to demand answers.

Rep. John James, R-Mich., led the charge, accusing F1 of “cartel-like behavior” and anti-competitive actions to protect European teams. This led to a congressional inquiry and calls for an antitrust investigation by Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.

The tension escalated when Mario Andretti, the racing legend and patriarch of the Andretti dynasty, visited Washington and clashed with Liberty Media CEO Greg Maffei. Allegations of personal bias and anti-competitive practices were raised, leading to legal implications.

The dispute highlights the struggle between an aspiring American team and the established F1 hierarchy. With the involvement of U.S. lawmakers and the threat of legal action, the future of Andretti Global in F1 hangs in the balance.

As the Monaco Grand Prix unfolds, the debate over Andretti’s entry into F1 continues to captivate fans and industry insiders. The outcome of this high-stakes battle could reshape the landscape of motorsport and have far-reaching implications for American racing on the global stage.