Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

G7 Officials Report Growing Support for US Plan to Utilize Frozen Russian Asset Revenues

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The G7 nations are considering a new proposal to use future interest on frozen Russian assets to aid Ukraine, rather than seizing them outright. This proposal, which could generate around $5 billion a year, is gaining momentum among G7 officials as they prepare for a summit in Italy in June.

However, there are still disagreements among G7 members about certain “holdbacks” that could reduce the expected windfall profits to $2.5-$3.0 billion. These holdbacks include Belgium’s tax rate, a fee from depository Euroclear, and a proposed litigation reserve.

Despite these challenges, G7 finance ministers will revisit the issue in late May with the goal of reaching a consensus proposal to present to leaders at the June summit. The urgency to build international consensus is clear, as there is a recognition that more needs to be done to support Ukraine.

The proposal to collateralize the interest earned on the frozen Russian assets is seen as a practical approach that could provide a longer-term stream of funding for Ukraine. This idea has the potential to bridge the gap in financing that Ukraine is expected to face in 2025 and 2026.

While Washington maintains that all options, including seizing Russian assets, are justified under international law, the focus is on building consensus around a plan that can provide immediate assistance to Ukraine. The shift towards focusing on interest from the assets comes after facing resistance from some European countries concerned about the impact on the euro.

Overall, the proposal to use future interest on frozen Russian assets to aid Ukraine is seen as a reasonable approach that could lead to a positive agreement in June. The G7 countries are committed to keeping the Russian assets frozen until certain conditions are met, ensuring a long-term income stream for Ukraine.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money