Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Harvey Weinstein’s Conviction in New York is Reversed

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In a shocking turn of events, New York’s highest court overturned Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 conviction on felony sex crime charges in a 4-to-3 decision on Thursday. This decision has left many women who bravely spoke out against Weinstein feeling horrified and dismayed, as their efforts had played a significant role in accelerating the #MeToo movement.

The New York Court of Appeals sided with Weinstein’s defense team, agreeing that the trial judge, Justice James Burke, made a critical error by allowing witnesses to testify about uncharged criminal acts allegedly committed by Weinstein. These witnesses, known as Molineux witnesses, were permitted to share their experiences of assault, which the court deemed as unfairly tarnishing Weinstein’s character in front of the jury.

The ruling, which comes four years after Weinstein’s initial conviction, has raised questions about the prosecution’s strategies and the fairness of the trial. The dissenting judges criticized the majority for overturning the jury’s guilty verdict and expressed concerns about the impact on future sexual assault cases.

Despite the setback, victims and activists remain determined to seek justice. Dawn Dunning, one of the witnesses, emphasized the importance of speaking out and encouraged the Manhattan district attorney to retry the case. Ashley Judd, the first actress to come forward against Weinstein, expressed disappointment but reaffirmed her commitment to the truth.

While Weinstein’s conviction in New York has been overturned, he still faces a 16-year sentence in California for separate charges. His lawyer plans to appeal the California conviction, citing similarities in the use of uncharged allegations as evidence. The legal battle continues for Weinstein as he awaits further proceedings in both states.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money