Justice Minister Paul Lam of Hong Kong emphasized the need for balance between protecting national security and fostering development in a recent statement. Lam addressed concerns about the city’s Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, which was implemented in March as a response to Beijing’s national security law.
Lam highlighted the importance of distinguishing between legitimate criticism of the government and seditious intentions. He acknowledged that the sedition offence had raised worries among residents about expressing dissent, but he emphasized that constructive criticism was essential for driving better policymaking.
During a forum, law professor Han Dayuan from Renmin University in Beijing also weighed in on the issue, stating that the threshold for conviction on seditious intention was very high. He underscored the importance of upholding judicial independence in national security cases and respecting the professional adjudication by Hong Kong judges.
Both Lam and Dayuan emphasized the role of the rule of law in fostering social consensus and ensuring a fair legal process. They encouraged residents to continue voicing their opinions and criticisms within the bounds of the law.
The discussion surrounding national security and free speech in Hong Kong reflects the complex dynamics at play in the city. As tensions persist, the need for open dialogue and respect for legal principles remains crucial for maintaining stability and upholding democratic values.