Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

How the West Could Utilize Russia’s Frozen Reserves to Aid Ukraine

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The G7 nations are considering using nearly $300 billion in frozen Russian financial assets to support Ukraine in the midst of the ongoing conflict. However, the process of how to utilize these assets is proving to be complex and controversial.

One proposal is to seize the immobilized Russian reserves in their entirety and allocate them to Ukraine. This idea is supported by some legal experts who argue it can be done under the doctrine of international law known as “countermeasures.” The assets would then be sold or collateralized, with the proceeds going to Ukraine or a dedicated reconstruction fund.

European officials, on the other hand, have raised concerns that this approach could violate international law and lead to legal challenges from Russia. Previous examples of such seizures occurred after wars had ended, not during active conflicts like the current situation in Ukraine.

Another suggestion is to ringfence the profits from the Russian assets for Ukraine, with estimates suggesting it could amount to 15-20 billion euros by 2027. The European Commission has proposed that 90% of the proceeds go towards a fund for military aid for Ukraine, with the remaining 10% supporting other needs in Kyiv.

To navigate the legal complexities, some experts have proposed issuing “reparation bonds” that would pay out only if Ukraine receives compensation from Russia for damages incurred during the war. This approach could provide a way for Ukraine to collect on any damages awarded, up to the value of the frozen reserves.

The G7 leaders are expected to discuss and potentially make a decision on how to handle the frozen assets at their annual summit in Italy in June. The goal is to find a solution that supports Ukraine while navigating the legal and logistical challenges involved in accessing the Russian assets.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money