Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

In the Upcoming Antitrust Trial, Verdict to be Rendered by Judge Instead of Jury

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In a significant legal development, a judge has been appointed to decide whether Google violated federal antitrust laws by monopolizing the technology behind online advertising. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema made the decision on Friday, ruling against the Justice Department’s request for a jury trial.

The case, filed last year in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, centered around the government’s claim that Google’s anticompetitive conduct led to overcharging federal agencies for online ads. While the government sought monetary damages of less than $750,000, Google argued that it had already compensated the agencies, rendering the damages claim moot.

During a hearing in Alexandria, Justice Department lawyers contended that Google’s payment did not eliminate the need for a jury trial. However, Judge Brinkema sided with Google, stating that the amount of the payment covered the government’s initial claim. She likened the payment to “receiving a wheelbarrow of cash.”

In response to the ruling, Google issued a statement expressing satisfaction with the decision to have the case tried by a judge. The tech giant maintained that the case was meritless and aimed at unfairly influencing competition in the industry.

While Google also argued that the constitutional right to a jury trial does not apply to civil suits brought by the government, the government did not seek a ruling on that matter. The case is set to proceed with Judge Brinkema presiding over the proceedings.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money