Insights from Trump trial shed light on former president’s manipulation of the media

The first week of testimony in former President Donald Trump’s trial in New York City has been filled with revelations about his approach to the media and his reaction to criticism. Testimony has shown that Trump’s method of controlling the news cycle involves paying off media professionals, a departure from the typical strategy of hiring media strategists to shape a positive message.

Political communication scholar Karrin Vasby Anderson noted that Trump’s transactional approach to the media is concerning, as he seeks to influence journalists through payments, threats, or intimidation. This week, Trump was caught misquoting Fox News host Jesse Watters, who later amended his report to match Trump’s false statement, raising questions about journalistic integrity.

Legal scholar Tim Bakken highlighted Trump’s aggressive response to media criticism, pointing out that Trump believes the press distorts reality to his disadvantage. Bakken compared NPR’s alleged bias to Fox News, suggesting that Trump’s combative stance against the media is a result of feeling disconnected from what he perceives as unfair institutions.

Anderson expressed concern over Trump’s unprecedented tactics, such as misquoting journalists to fit his narrative, leading to juror backlash and resignations. She emphasized that Trump’s behavior towards the media is not typical of past presidents, regardless of political affiliation.

As the trial continues, the focus remains on Trump’s unconventional relationship with the media and the implications for democracy. Regardless of the outcome, the case sheds light on Trump’s unique approach to handling the press and the potential consequences for the future of political communication.