Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Japan AGC unit loses lawsuit for indirect gender discrimination

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In a groundbreaking ruling, a subsidiary of Japanese glass-maker AGC has been ordered to pay damages for indirect gender discrimination in a lawsuit filed by a female clerical worker. The Tokyo District Court ruled in favor of the 44-year-old plaintiff, who claimed that AGC Green-Tech limited its corporate housing program to career-track employees, all of whom were men.

The court ordered AGC Green-Tech to pay ¥3.7 million to the plaintiff, citing the revised equal employment opportunity law that prohibits indirect gender discrimination by imposing requirements that are difficult for women to meet. Despite having more female clerical workers than male career-track employees, the company only allowed the latter to use the corporate housing program.

While the court acknowledged that the different treatment did not constitute direct gender discrimination, it concluded that the company’s actions gave a disadvantage to women without a rational reason, thus constituting indirect discrimination. The ruling emphasized the need for a workplace free of discrimination where women can express their opinions and abilities.

The plaintiff expressed her satisfaction with the ruling, stating that she hoped the company would create a more inclusive work environment. Lawyer Kota Hirai hailed the ruling as “epoch-making,” as it is believed to be the first in Japan to recognize indirect gender discrimination. The ruling serves as a significant milestone in the fight against gender discrimination in the workplace.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money