Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Justice Thomas criticizes Brown v. Board of Education at an inopportune moment

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Criticizes Brown v. Board of Education Decision

WASHINGTON − Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas made headlines this week by criticizing a key aspect of the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision, which desegregated schools in the United States. Thomas argued that courts should not be involved in determining if congressional maps discriminate against Black people.

Thomas’s comments come just a week after the 70th anniversary of the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case. He specifically took issue with the court’s decision in 1955 to dictate how schools should comply with the initial ruling from 1954. Thomas argued that this approach was not supported by the Constitution or the nation’s history and tradition.

According to Thomas, federal courts do not have the authority to create new remedies as they see fit. He believes that the courts overstepped their bounds in enforcing desegregation measures and that such actions were only justified as temporary measures to overcome resistance.

In a recent case involving a South Carolina district accused of limiting the influence of Black voters, Thomas sided with the conservative majority in dismissing the challenge. He maintained that courts should not intervene in matters related to the drawing of congressional maps.

Thomas’s stance reflects his long-held belief that the judiciary should not engage in what he calls “extravagant uses of judicial power.” This latest critique adds to his previous statements on the limits of court intervention in matters of racial equality.

As the debate over the role of the judiciary in addressing racial discrimination continues, Thomas’s comments are sure to spark further discussion and debate among legal scholars and civil rights advocates.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money