In a recent analysis by military expert Sean Bell, it has been revealed that Russian President Putin’s critical vulnerability lies in Western military capability. As tensions continue to rise in Ukraine, Russia has been ramping up its military strategy while also engaging in targeted rhetoric and information operations to deter Western governments from increasing support to Ukraine.
Putin’s concerns have escalated to the point where he has resorted to more inflammatory rhetoric, including regular mentions of nuclear capabilities. The threat of nuclear escalation has been used as a deterrent to prevent Western intervention in Ukraine, as Putin knows that a nuclear war would have no winners under the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction.
Despite the aggressive tactics employed by Russia, the question remains – if the West is deterred from protecting Ukraine, what are the implications for Russia’s wider ambitions and China’s interests as well? Russia’s recent display of its powerful intercontinental ballistic missile, SATAN II, serves as a reminder of its capabilities to deliver nuclear weapons anywhere on Earth.
While no civilized nation desires war, there are times when confronting tyrants becomes necessary to preserve cherished values and way of life. Putin’s strategy of deterring Western engagement seems to be working, but if the West chooses not to challenge Russia’s aggressive expansion, what will be the consequences for global stability?
As the world watches the escalating tensions in Ukraine, the decision on how to address Russian aggression becomes increasingly crucial. History has shown that confronting tyrants early on is essential, and the international community must carefully consider its next steps in the face of Putin’s aggressive tactics.