The UK government’s new plans for relationships, sex, and health education (RSHE) in primary and secondary schools in England have sparked controversy and concern among educators and parents. The proposed age parameters for key issues in sex education, with no education on sex for children under the age of 9, have raised questions about the effectiveness and impact of the new guidelines.
A consultation on these plans has been launched, with critics arguing that the recommendations set out in the policy are in direct conflict with years of research in this area of education. The age limits in the new draft guidance set out that puberty should not be taught before year four, sex education should not be taught before year five, and issues regarding sexual harassment should not be taught before year seven.
Critics argue that these strict parameters around the ages children can be taught specific information will restrict teachers from delivering crucial education adapted to their pupils’ needs. Research has shown that early education on topics such as puberty and sexual harassment can help prepare children and keep them safe.
Furthermore, the new proposals also limit education on LGBTQ+ identities, which conflicts with what young people say they want from RSHE. Research has shown that inclusive RSHE benefits all students and creates a better learning environment.
Overall, critics argue that the new guidelines are naive and dangerous, posing a serious risk to the psychological and physical health and well-being of children and young people. The debate over the new RSHE plans is likely to continue as stakeholders voice their concerns and advocate for evidence-based and inclusive sex education in schools.