Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Report finds NYPD continues to disregard public disclosure law regarding high-tech surveillance devices

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The NYPD has come under fire for failing to follow a public disclosure law when introducing new high-tech surveillance gadgets, including a robot dog and a robot deployed in the Times Square subway station, according to a new report by the city Department of Investigation.

The Police Department is required to publish an “Impact and Use Policy” detailing how it will use new surveillance devices and technology 90 days in advance, allowing for public comments. However, the NYPD instead amended existing policy documents with information about the new devices, leaving out key details required by the Post Act.

DOI Commissioner Jocelyn Strauber highlighted similar findings in 2022, stating that “Individual technologies could be shielded from public scrutiny and oversight.” The report emphasized the need for transparency and public input in the use of surveillance technologies.

In response, a police spokesperson emphasized the administration’s commitment to public safety while using technology lawfully. However, Albert Fox Cahn of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project criticized the NYPD for violating elements of the Post Act and hiding crucial data with opaque policies.

Jerome Greco of the Legal Aid Society expressed concern over New Yorkers being used as “guinea pigs” for the city’s experiments with invasive technology, calling for alternative solutions to address public safety.

The Post Act requires the NYPD to disclose information on its use of surveillance technologies, but the deployment of high-tech devices like the Knightscope K5 and DigiDog has raised concerns among residents. The report serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in law enforcement’s use of new technologies.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money