Responses to the Reversal of Harvey Weinstein’s New York Rape Conviction

The overturning of Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 New York conviction for sexual assault and rape has sparked a range of reactions from various individuals involved in the case. Douglas Wigdor, lawyer for eight Weinstein accusers, expressed disappointment in the decision, calling it a setback in holding perpetrators of sexual violence accountable. He emphasized the impact on the victims who may now have to endure another trial.

On the other hand, Emily Tuttle, spokesperson for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, vowed to retry the case and support survivors of sexual assault. Jeff Herman, attorney for some of Weinstein’s accusers in civil cases, highlighted the importance of civil cases in exposing predators and institutions that enable them.

Weinstein’s defense lawyer, Arthur Aidala, hailed the ruling as a victory for all citizens charged with a crime, emphasizing the importance of constitutional protections. However, Lindsay Goldbrum, a lawyer for Weinstein accusers, expressed concern that the ruling may discourage future victims from coming forward.

The Silence Breakers group, representing women who accused Weinstein and others of sexual misconduct, called the decision unjust but vowed to continue advocating for survivors. Actress Ashley Judd, one of Weinstein’s accusers, labeled the ruling as an act of institutional betrayal.

Overall, the reactions to the overturning of Weinstein’s conviction reflect a mix of disappointment, determination, and concern for the impact on survivors of sexual assault. The case continues to be a focal point in the ongoing conversation about accountability and justice for victims of sexual violence.