Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Sanctions put pressure on Ghana and Uganda over anti-LGBTQ+ laws

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Uganda’s Constitutional Court recently made a ruling to water down a tough anti-LGBTQ+ law, a decision that many believe was influenced by concerns over potential international sanctions. The court’s move to strike out several contentious clauses from the law came after similar legislation in Ghana faced obstacles due to warnings from the Finance Ministry about potential aid cuts.

Steven Kabuye, a Ugandan LGBTQ+ activist, suggested that the court’s decision was aimed at appeasing international donors who had raised objections to certain clauses that created barriers to health services, particularly HIV/AIDS care. The Anti-Homosexuality Act in Uganda, enacted in May 2023, imposed severe penalties for LGBTQ+ individuals, leading to sanctions from the United States and the World Bank.

Despite the court’s ruling to remove some controversial measures from the law, critics argue that many draconian provisions still remain in force, indicating that sanctions have only had a partial impact. The threat of economic sanctions also played a role in Ghana, where President Nana Akufo-Addo has not yet signed a tough anti-LGBTQ+ bill into law due to concerns about potential financial repercussions.

The debate over international sanctions on African countries continues, with some advocating for targeted measures against key advocates of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation. Additionally, the shift towards seeking economic ties with countries like China, which do not impose conditions on anti-LGBTQ+ laws, highlights a changing dynamic in global relations.

As the discussion on LGBTQ+ rights and international pressure evolves, the impact of sanctions on African nations remains a contentious issue with implications for human rights and economic development.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money