Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

State Officials Believe $20 Billion Investment in California’s Water Tunnel Will Be Worth It

Reading Time: < 1 minute

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration announced on Thursday that the cost to build a massive tunnel to capture more water and prepare for longer droughts caused by climate change has increased to over $20 billion. The tunnel project aims to store water from the Sacramento River during major storms and send it south for storage.

Initially estimated at $16 billion in 2020, the new analysis attributes the cost increase to inflation, which surged after the pandemic. Despite the higher price tag, the project is said to yield $38 billion in benefits, primarily due to an increased water supply that would be better protected from natural disasters like earthquakes.

However, the tunnel project has faced significant opposition from environmental groups, who warn of devastating impacts on the already fragile ecosystem of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Concerns include lost agricultural land, reduced water quality, and impacts on air quality, transportation, and noise.

In addition to environmental concerns, the project has become a political flashpoint in the Central Valley’s farming communities, where it is viewed as a move by Southern California to take water from the north. Lawmakers have blocked efforts to accelerate the tunnel’s construction, with U.S. Rep. Josh Harder criticizing the project as benefiting urban areas at the expense of rural communities.

The proposed tunnel, part of the State Water Project, would be crucial in addressing water supply challenges exacerbated by climate change. State officials predict a 22% decline in water deliveries by 2070 due to climate change, making the tunnel’s increased water capture capacity essential for ensuring water security in the future.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money