Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

The federal government is misusing its authority to target private-sector education providers

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The Wall Street Journal recently highlighted the federal agencies targeting Elon Musk and his companies, hindering the progress of SpaceX’s Starship. The Biden administration is employing similar tactics to impede innovation in higher education, particularly targeting student loan servicer MOHELA.

The Department of Education (DOE) is taking over management of loan programs from servicers like MOHELA, potentially paving the way for more loan forgiveness. However, the DOE’s mismanagement has already led to enrollment declines and financial aid application drops in states like California.

This pattern of government targeting private-sector opponents dates back to the Obama administration, with for-profit colleges and online program management companies facing regulatory scrutiny and closures. The threat of regulation has caused OPM stocks to plummet, prompting pushback from companies and calls for protection from financial fallout.

Some for-profit enterprises are abandoning profit-seeking to avoid regulatory challenges, such as Grand Canyon University’s conversion to nonprofit status. The University of Phoenix is also seeking to drop its for-profit status through an acquisition by the state of Idaho, facing scrutiny from regulators.

These regulatory overreaches harm students and limit program options, with private-sector players urged to resist and protect themselves from being targeted. Michael Brickman, an adjunct fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, emphasizes the need for companies to fight back against regulatory overreach to ensure fair treatment and innovation in higher education.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money