Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Top New York court overturns Harvey Weinstein’s conviction, shaking up Entertainment News

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The overturning of Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 conviction for sexual assault and rape has sent shockwaves through the #MeToo movement and raised questions about accountability for powerful men. The decision by New York’s highest court to grant Weinstein a new trial has reignited the debate over how sexual violence cases are handled in the legal system.

The 4-3 decision by the state’s Court of Appeals cited errors made by the trial judge, including allowing testimony from women who were not part of the charges Weinstein faced and allowing prejudicial cross-examination. The majority opinion called for a new trial, while dissenting judges criticized the decision for perpetuating outdated notions of sexual violence.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who inherited the case from his predecessor Cyrus Vance, now faces the decision of how to proceed against Weinstein. Despite the overturned conviction, Weinstein still faces a 16-year prison sentence in California for a separate rape conviction.

The news has been met with disappointment and frustration by advocates for survivors of sexual assault. Lawyer Douglas Wigdor, who represented eight of Weinstein’s accusers, called the decision a “major step back in holding those accountable for acts of sexual violence.”

Weinstein, once a powerful figure in Hollywood as the co-founder of Miramax film studio, has become a symbol of the #MeToo movement and the reckoning with sexual misconduct in various industries. The decision to grant him a new trial has left many wondering about the future of the case and the impact it will have on the fight against sexual violence.

Taylor Swifts New Album Release Health issues from using ACs Boston Marathon 2024 15 Practical Ways To Save Money